An Ethics Pledge Can Help Restore Public Trust in Santa Clara

By Dr. Tom Shanks

I urge candidates for the 2024 Santa Clara City Council, Police Chief, and City Clerk elections to sign the Santa Clara Ethics Pledge, a new independent initiative to promote ethical campaigning, trustworthy leadership, and public trust in the City of Santa Clara.  

The Santa Clara Ethics Pledge is the first project of Public Ethics Now (PEN), whose mission is to promote practical ethics for public trust.  

I was the City of Santa Clara’s ethics consultant from 1998-2014,  and I will lead this effort as a public service.  I am a non-partisan advocate for ethical leadership and public trust.  

I ask Santa Clara candidates to read the pledge and contact me if they would like to discuss it. I will publicize on my website those who have signed the pledge. 

The Need for the Pledge

I developed the Ethics Pledge because the current City Council majority, City Manager, and City Attorney have failed to uphold high ethical standards, jeopardizing public trust. They have:

  • Ignored recommendations from three Civil Grand Jury reports.
  • Leaked the Grand Jury Report to the SF 49ers, undermining the Grand Jury’s credibility.
  • Dismissed resident efforts to hold them accountable.
  • Prioritized personal and political interests over the public good.
  • Disregarded the City’s Code of Ethics & Values and violated the Behavioral Standards for Council Members.
  • Neglected to follow up on a motion to hire an ethics consultant, missing out on necessary education, advice, and accountability. 

It’s time for action to begin to restore integrity and trust in Santa Clara’s leadership.

That’s the reason for the Santa Clara Ethics Pledge. It’s time for real political leadership in the City.  “Real political leadership offers to lead the people to where, in their best selves, they really want to go,” as religious leader and writer Jim Wallis said..  That’s what those who sign this pledge offer the people of Santa Clara. 

Santa Clara Ethics Pledge

The purpose of an ethical political campaign in the City of Santa Clara in 2024 is to win and at the same time to build public trust by giving the voters the information they need to make their best voting decision.   

Ethical Campaigns can be hard-fought, passionately argued, and competitive. The fight, however, is about issues; the argument is over the best way to meet public needs; and the competition is between generous and talented neighbors in a race to provide the best public service. 

THEREFORE, as a candidate for public office, I promise the people of Santa Clara that my campaign and my future service will adhere to the highest standards of honesty, fairness, respect, and responsibility.  Specifically: 

1. GRAND JURY:  I accept the findings of the Grand Jury Reports and agree that the City of Santa Clara has a public trust problem.  Moreover, I have a duty to rebuild public trust, beginning with this campaign.  I will read the Code of Ethics & Values and the Behavioral Standards, practice their behaviors and ethical decision-making, and raise ethics issues as part of our regular discussion as Candidates and Council members.

2. ISSUES:   I will focus my campaign on issues relevant for Santa Clara now and in the future, on character strengths and weaknesses that I believe are relevant for the position my opponent and I are running for – not on issues that are irrelevant and meant to distract voters for the sake of winning a political campaign.  

3. HONESTY:  I will tell the truth about myself and my opponent without overstating, understating, leaving out relevant context, and making up facts.  I will present evidence to support positive or negative claims I make in print or online about myself or my opponent’s record, character, and positions.  

4. CAMPAIGN COMMUNICATIONS: My campaign communications will allow my opponent a reasonable amount of time to respond to claims I make about his/her position or qualifications. As a candidate for City Council, Police Chief, or City Clerk,  I pledge to uphold the highest ethical standards throughout my campaign and tenure in office. 

5. DISCOURAGING NEGATIVE CAMPAIGNING: If an independent expenditure attacks my opponent, I will immediately condemn such behavior with a public statement.  If elected, I will recuse myself from votes related to the funders of the negative  attack. Even though the law allows money to have an outsized influence on politics and local elections, the law is the minimal standard, not the higher ethical standard which strengthens, rather than weakens, public trust. Negative campaigns by independent expenditures are particularly harmful to public trust and, therefore, should be strongly discouraged by candidates with the leverage that they have during the campaign and, if elected, while in office.

6. RESPECT:  I will treat other candidates, the public, people who disagree with me, and my critics with respect, as I would treat a respected colleague.  I will attack issues, not people, and will never demean or mock. I will  respect differing viewpoints and foster a civil and respectful dialogue within the community.  

7. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS: I will follow all local, state, federal laws and regulations governing campaign finance, disclosure, ethics, and public service.  I will file all forms by their deadlines. I understand that breaking the law damages or destroys public trust.  To foster the public’s trust my behavior must follow the most demanding ethics standards.

8. ETHICS EXPERTISE:  I will support the multi-year hiring of an ethics expert at a compensation equivalent to that paid to other consultants  who do important City work.  The ethics expert will work with candidates, the Council, and staff to rediscover city ethics, reinvent the City’s ethics code, rebuild and reposition the Ethics Program, and recommit to practical skills, accountability, and enforcement to build public trust.  

9. ETHICS COMMISSION: I support an Ethics Commission with subpoena power, professional staff, membership independent of Council members, and a guaranteed source of funding.  The Ethics Commission will be responsible for the development of an Ethics Program and will provide advice, training, investigate complaints, enforcement, and  hold public officials accountable for ethics promises they make.  The Commission will also have the option to recommend action to other law enforcement agencies if they discover wrongdoing.

I pledge to uphold these principles, practices, and pledges to the best of my ability, recognizing that serving the public’s needs and earning their trust is paramount in serving our community effectively. I challenge my opponent to do the same.

But if my opponent won’t sign the pledge or signs the pledge and violates it, my opponent has chosen to make ethics and public trust a central issue in this campaign and a central difference between us.   

Tom Shanks can be reached at: drshanks@publicethicsnow.com

3 comments

  1. Dr. Shanks
    This seems like such a low bar.
    Appointed or Elected, this should not even be a topic of discussion.
    Take the Ethics Oath and then “Walk the Walk”.
    Represent your neighbors, friends, family.

    You all tired of this negative BS?
    We just need you to vote in a way that will benefit all the residents.
    Not one small company that couldn’t even afford to buy their own land or build their own buildings.
    Hard to remember the 49ers are just Renters.

    It’s our land
    It’s our building

    Better Days are ahead!!!
    Register by Oct 21st
    Then vote in early November (Or Sooner)

    Burt Field

  2. Great effort!!

    Kevin Park in 2009 led an reffort to reject an ethics commission in 2009. Why? He said he did not like the proponents How mature!

    Karen led a group callng itself POLITICAL INTEGRITY AND ETHICS. So why not now.

    Becker attacked it. INDICTED PERJURER.

    Time to do it.

Leave a Reply