Is the Santa Clara Unified School District Covering Up Information for a Teacher, Employee or Administrator?

By Robert Haugh

This is an open letter to the Santa Clara Unified School District Board of Trustees.

TO:  Jim Canova, Albert Gonzalez, Jodi Muirhead, Noelani Pearl Hunt, Andy Ratermann, Mark Richardson and Michele Ryan

I’ve been trying to get some basic information from your SCUSD staff for over four months now.  The request was simple: who’s using a school computer during school hours to post comments to Santa Clara News Online? We hope you and your administration will take action because you care about transparency — and following the letter and spirit of the law.

I first requested this info on November 20, 2017. I was told by SCUSD Public Information Officer Jennifer Dericco to send an “official” California Public Records Act (CPRA) Request.  So I did on December 5, 2017.

What’s the CPRA?

The law is similar to the Freedom of Information Act, except that “the people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct of the people’s business” is enshrined in Article 1 of the California Constitution due to California Proposition 59 (the Sunshine Amendment, 2004). [Source: Wikipedia

Under the CPRA, local agencies, like SCUSD are encouraged as a best practice to:

  • Respond to a public record request within 10 days
  • Provide electronic records in its native format
  • Provide a reason for denying a request

On January 16, 2018, about 40 days after my initial request,  Andrew C. Lucia, SCUSD Assistant Superintendent, School Support and District Development referred me to the Santa Clara County Office of Education (COE), saying that SCUSD doesn’t have the info. Really?

So I contacted the COE, and guess what? On February 6, 2018, they said that SCUSD does have the info.  Peter Daniels, Chief Public Affairs Officer of the COE responded in writing  that SCUSD has staff “specifically tasked with managing the network addresses and domains we have assigned to them.” That same day, I made a second CPRA request to Lucia.

On February 22, 2018, Lucia responded that there was no way to tell who the user was. Really?

We’ve talked to some people at SCUSD and in other school districts who know something about the computer systems. The response that your district staff doesn’t know is not credible. Is it possible that your district is covering up information? If so, are you doing it for political purposes?

We hope you, the Board of Trustees, cares about transparency and following the letter and spirit of the CPRA. If so, we hope you’ll ask your administration to comply with this request.

Thank you.



  1. But will they though….. From personal experiance, this isnt the only thing SCUSD covers up. There’s quite a bit. Im about to go public with my chids story with the media and hope it sheds some light on this very corupt district! Ask them about there school cameras and the bullying, schoold deleteing footage to aviod any focus on there school…… Very corupt district.

    • I’d like to hear more about your story. My child has been bullied and harassed by the school staff, including the principal. They are using lies to cover up what they have done.

  2. This is not the only thing the School Board is covering up and a lot of people know what it is.

  3. Might just be a lack of logs monitoring access. is encrypted so there isn’t much metadata collected from the client (SCUSD) side. If SCUSD is using some sort of NAT’ed (network address translation) firewall architecture which is universally standard, including routers in most homes these days, then it would be very difficult to discern who is using a particular public IP address at any point in time.

    I’m not trying to protect them, nor do I work for them but enhanced client-side security has made tracking of internal activity very challenging without expensive methods being implemented.

  4. Sounds like someone has something to hide. If they are protecting a certain individual’s use of a computer, what else are they protecting about that certain individual? Very, very interesting. Go, Robert.

Leave a Reply